In Defense of Routine Recovery of Cadaveric Organs: A Response to Walter Glannon  

Oleh:

Spital, Aaron ; Taylor, James S

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics (keterangan: ada di Proquest) vol. 17 no. 03 (2008), page 337.

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan FK Nomor Panggil: C01.K.2008.01 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

Walter Glannon argues that our proposal for routine recovery (also known as conscription) of transplantable cadaveric organs is unacceptable "even if the consequence of [continuing to require consent] would be fewer organs for transplatation and fewer lives saved." After carefully reviewing his countearguments, we conclude that, although some of them have merit, none are sufficiently strong to warrant abandoning this plan. Below we respond to each of Glannon's concerns.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali