The Emergence of Implicit Criteria Actually Used by Reviewers of Qualitative Research Articles Case of a European Journal  

Oleh:

Savall, Henri ; Zardet, Veronique ; Bonnet, Marc ; Peron, Michel

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Organizational Research Methods vol. 11 no. 3 (Jul. 2008), page 510-540.
Topik: Academic Review Process; Qualitative Content Analysis; Implicit Criteria; Method; Replicability; Validity
Fulltext: 510.pdf (234.85KB)

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: OO3.10 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

This article brings to light the actual evaluation practices of reviewers when assessing qualitative manuscripts. The authors conducted the first empirical research entirely based on reviewer reports for a journal on management sciences over a 28-year period. Content analysis of 474 reviewer reports written by 56 reviewers identified 19 critical points and 10 criteria, making up a synthetic table of 190 possible cells, 51 of which proved to be actually used by reviewers. These findings are then compared with the quality criteria but also throws new light on a number of discrepancies. Analysis over time shows marked evolution from emphasis on internal validity criteria over the first 10 years toward emphasis on external validity criteria in the past 10 years. Factors ensuring reliability and replicability of the results of this research are discussed at length.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali