Percutaneous Intervention vs. Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting in Left Main Coronary Disease  

Oleh:

Jones, Robert H.

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: The New England Journal of Medicine (keterangan: ada di Proquest) vol. 358 no. 17 (Apr. 2008), page 1851.

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan FK Nomor Panggil: N08.K.2008.02 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

A recent meta-analysis, report, and editorial all agreed with the need for a randomized trial of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as compared with coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with left main coronary artery disease.1,2,3 The meta-analysis reported results of 16 observational studies on 1278 patients undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.1 Mortality was 2.3% during hospitalization and 5.5% at the time of last follow-up, at a median of 10 months. Five randomized comparisons of PCI and CABG were noted to be ongoing, with combined enrollment goals exceeding 2400 patients with unprotected left main . . .

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali