Respedeo: Method and Content in Casuistry  

Oleh:

Wildes, Kevin Wm.

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy vol. 19 no. 1 (Feb. 1994), page 115-120.
Topik: Casuistry; Content; Jonsen; Method; Rhetoric; Tallmon; Toulmin

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: MM80.2 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

James Tallmon has argued that my criticisms of Jonsen and Toulmin are ill founded. Tallmon argues that Jonsen and Toulmin argue for a method of rhetorical reasoning and not for a particular content. He argues that if one distigusihes the content and method of casuistry the Jonsen-Toulmin model can work. But Tallmon, like Jonsen and Toulmin, cannot escape the need for casuistry to have a content. Tallmon’s response evidences that need since he assume that there is a ‘Medical Communiy’ which has a moral vision.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali