A Desperate Solution: Individual Autonomy And The Double-Blind Controlled Experiment  

Oleh:

Logue, Gerald ; Wear, Stephen

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy vol. 20 no. 1 (Feb. 1995), page 57-64.
Topik: Autonomy; Voluntariness; Exploitation; Informed Consent; Double-Blind Experimentation; Randomization

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: MM80.3 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

The randomization ingredient in double-blind controlled experiments may be objectionable to patients who, in their desperation, come to such trials seeking a last chance of cure. Minogue et al., who view such a situation as inherently exploitive and undermining of patient autonomy, Propose that such "desperate volunteers" instead be enrolled in the active arm, while other patients, less desperate and more committed to medical progress, continue to be randomized. Their view is critiqued as destructive of medical progress, inapproalistic notions of autonomy and voluntariness.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali