Teori Retributivisme tentang Hukuman Legal  

Oleh:

Ohoitimur, Yong

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah nasional - tidak terakreditasi DIKTI - atma jaya
Dalam koleksi: Atma nan Jaya vol. 7 no. 3 (Dec. 1994), page 61-75.
Topik: Teori Retributivisme; Hukuman Legal
Fulltext: Yong Ohoitimur.pdf (1.61MB)

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: AA48 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada	Lihat Detail Induk
Perpustakaan PKPM Nomor Panggil: A66 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada	Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

The core debate throughout the history of criminology has been between theories of punishment. If punishment is always hurting, why punish? This is obviously an ethical question which searches for moral justification of punishment. Different answers to this question have been defended by different adherents of theories. This article critically discusses retributivism's reply as defended by its most important representatives, Kant and Hegel. Since men have autonomy and freedom - so runs the argument - they have to be responsible for their own action. Every wrongdoer deserves punishment; transgression demands retribution.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali