Arguing Along The Slippery Slope of Human Embryo Research  

Oleh:

Salmon Freeman, Jeanne

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy vol. 21 no. 1 (Feb. 1996), page 61-81.
Topik: Embryo; Human; Slippery Slope

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: MM80.5 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

One frequent argument in the debate over federal funding of human embryo research is the slippery slope argument. Slope arguments can be of several types: either logical, empirical, or full (a combination of logical and empirical slope arguments againts human embryo research suggests that funding embryo research could undermine current protections for human subjects research, erode respect for persons with disabilities, and encourage eugenics practices. While the Panel commissioned by National Institues of Health to issue funding guildelines regarding human embryo research acknowledges some slippery slope concerns, the Panel's final report fails to address such concerns in any depth. Given this failure seriously to address these valid concerns, federal funding of embryo research should not proceed at this time.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali