Four Approaches To Doing Ethics  

Oleh:

Levi, Benjamin H.

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy vol. 21 no. 1 (Feb. 1996), page 7-39.
Topik: Casusistry; Deductivism; Ethics; Feminism; Principlism; Relationsim

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: MM80.5 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

Within the field of medical ethics there is a starting amount of diversity regarding which issues and relationship are deemed relevant for ethical inquiry and analysis, what strategies are appropriate for examining and resolving ethical conflict, what should be the goals for medical ethics, even who should participate in that project. What I will try to make clear in this paper is that how we go to about this process of doing medical ethics, examining, reflecting, decision making, and behaving makes a practical difference, and not just a philosophical one, in terms of the understandings we will reach about ethical matters. Without attempting to resolve any of the conflicts within or between difference, and not just a philosophical one, in terms of understandings we will reach about ethical matters. Without attempting to resolve any of the conflicts within or between different conception of doing ethics, I will try to articulate the differences in orientation, and particulary the tone and educational emphasis, that attend four major contemporary approaches to ethical inquiry and analysis: deductivism, principlism, modern casusistry, and feminist/relationist ethics.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali