Barnes vs Addy Claims and The Ability Indefeasibility of Torrens Title  

Oleh:

Harding, Matthew

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Melbourne University Law Review vol. 31 no. 2 (2007), page 343-366.
Topik: ABILITY; claims; indefeasibility; torrens title

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: MM70 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

This article considers the proper relationship between Barnes v Addy claims and the indefeasibility of Torrens title. In some recent Australian cases, including Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd, courts have regarded this question as an important one to be resolved by balancing competing fundamental philosophies. Yet in other recent Australian cases, the question has been all but ignored. This article argues that, although the Torrens system may be underpinned by competing fundamental philosophies, these are no more apparent, nor any more difficult to reconcile, in cases involving Barnes v Addy claims than in cases involving claims of other types. The key to the argument is a correct understanding of the remedies that are available in response to a successful Barnes v Addy claim. This article concentrates on those remedies.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali