Anda belum login :: 17 Feb 2025 10:22 WIB
Detail
ArtikelContractualism and Deontic Restrictions  
Oleh: Brand-Ballard, Jeffrey
Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Ethics: An International Journal of Social Political and Legal Philosophy vol. 114 no. 2 (Jan. 2004), page 269-300.
Topik: Impersonality; Impartiality; Utilitarians; Harm
Ketersediaan
  • Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi)
    • Nomor Panggil: EE44.17
    • Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0)
    • Tandon: tidak ada
    Lihat Detail Induk
Isi artikelDilemmas with the following structure play a central role in normative ethics: agent must decide between doing harm to one person and allowing harm to befall several others. That is, he must decide whether to perform a minimizing violation. Moral theories diverge regarding quentialism, for example, often permits and sometimes requires them: the agent may maim another person whenever doing so is expected to promote the good (e.g., by minimizing total maimings). Moast of us, however, believe it is wrong for the agent to maim in at least some such cases. This is to say that our ordinary morality includes certain deontic restrictions ("restrictions").
Opini AndaKlik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali
design
 
Process time: 0.015625 second(s)