Is Terrorism Distinctively Wrong?  

Oleh:

McPherson, Lionel K.

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Ethics: An International Journal of Social Political and Legal Philosophy vol. 117 no. 3 (Apr. 2007), page 524-546.
Topik: Teroris; War; U.S.; Murder

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: EE44.23 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

Many people, including philosophers, believe that terrorism is necessarily and egregiously wrong. I will call this "the dominant view." The dominat view maintains that terrorism is a kind to murder. This forecloses the possibility that terrorism, under any circumstances, could be morally permissible-murder, by definition, is wrogful killing. The unqualified wrongness of terrorism is thus part of this understanding of terrorism. I will criticize the dominat view. Some philosophers have argued that terrorism might not be impermissible on either a right-based or a consequentialist analysis.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali