Reflective Moral Equilibrium and Psychological Theory  

Oleh:

Van Roojen, Mark

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Ethics: An International Journal of Social Political and Legal Philosophy vol. 109 no. 4 (Jul. 1999), page 846-857.
Topik: Moral; Ethics; Psikologi; Warren Quinn's; Doctrine of Doing and Allowing; Horowitz

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: EE44.9 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

Tamara Horowitz discusses and criticizes Warren Quinn's use of thought experiments to support a version of Doctrine of Doing and Allowing. She argues for the empirical explanatory hypthesis that another set of principles explains our common agreement on the correct outcome in those thought experiments. And she remarks along the way that therefore, contrary to Quinn's own conclusions, our intuitions concerning those examples do not provide support for the Doctrine of Doing and Allowing. In the course of the paper, Horowitz rebuts an objection from an anonymous reader that her argument misconstrues the role of such example in the process of reaching a set of conclusions in reflective equilibrium.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali