Detail Compulsory arbitration of Non-Union Employment Disputes   Oleh:  Zigarelli, Michael A. Jenis: Article from Bulletin/Magazine Dalam koleksi: Human Resource Management Review vol. 6 no. 3 (1996), page 183-206. Topik: arbitration; arbitration; non - union employment; disputes Ketersediaan Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: HH7 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada     Lihat Detail Induk Isi artikel In response to costly legal battles and proliferating causes of action for alleged employer misconduct, employers in the United States are beginning to require their employees to sign contracts that mandate binding arbitration of any employment dispute. These arbitration contracts have been the focus of much litigation because they compel employees to waive their right to sue their employers for employment discrimination, tortious conduct, and any other dispute that arises out of the employment relation. In Gilmer v. Interstate / Johnson Lane Corp. (1991), the U. S. Supreme Court cracked opened the door to the legitimacy of these contracts by sanctioning compulsory arbitration of an age discrimination claim. In the ensuing years, lower courts nationwide, except in the Sixth Circuit (Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee), have interpreted Gilmer to mean that employees can be required to arbitrate almost any employee rights question, provided that certain procedural guidelines are followed. This article presents an overview of the law and the literature in this area to assist human resource managers in designing a compulsory arbitration policy that will both survive legal scrutiny and operate to the mutual advantage of both employer and employee. Opini Anda Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini! Kembali

Copyright © 2006, 2007 Unika Atma Jaya, all rights reserved