Learning to Plan and Planning to Learn : Resolving The Planning School / Learning School Debate  

Oleh:

Brews, Peter J. ; Hunt, Michelle R.

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Strategic Management Journal vol. 20 no. 10 (1999), page 889-914.
Topik: school; formal strategic planning; logical incrementalism; environmental stability; firm performance

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan Pusat (Semanggi) Nomor Panggil: SS30.4 Non-tandon: 1 (dapat dipinjam: 0) Tandon: tidak ada

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

This paper resolves the long - standing debate between the two dominant process shools in strategy. Analysis of the planning practices of 656 firms shows that formal plannning and incrementalism both from part of "good" strategic planning, especially in unstable environments. Environment neither moderates the need for formal planning nor the direction of the planning / performance relationhsip, but does moderate firm planning capabilities and planning flexibility. In unstable environments planning capabilities are far better developed and formal plans more amenable to change. The planning . performance relationships is, however, moderated by planning duration : at least four years of formal planning are required before external performance associations are noted.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali