A Response To Matsuda And Tardy's "Voice In Academic Writing : The Rhetorical Construction Of Author Identity In Blind Manuscript Review  

Oleh:

Stapleton, Paul ; Helms-Park, Rena

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: English for Specific Purposes (Full Text) vol. 27 no. 1 (2008), page 94-99.
Topik: Bahasa
Fulltext: 27_01_Stapleton_Helms-Park.pdf (99.63KB)

Ketersediaan

Perpustakaan PKBB Nomor Panggil: 405/ESP/27 Non-tandon: tidak ada Tandon: 1

Lihat Detail Induk

Isi artikel

In a recent article in ESP, Matsuda and Tardy (2007) investigate the role of voice in academic writing via a simulated blind manuscript review process. Based on their findings, they claim that voice does playa role in such writing, and can for further research into the issue of the reader's construction of authorial identity. Matsuda and tardy study appears to have been triggered in part by articles we wrote several years ago (Helms-Park & Stapleton, 2003; Stapleton, 2002) in which we discussed the extent to which voice should be considered as a pedagogical tool in L2 undergraduate writing. In this rejoinder, we can into question Matsuda and Tardy characterization of our earlier work and also comment on their research methodology while further focusing on the qualities of voice which continue resonating with writing researchers.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali