Between Cosmopolitan and American Democracy: Understanding US Opposition to the International Criminal Court  

Oleh:

Ralph, Jason

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: International Relations vol. 17 no. 2 (Jun. 2003), page 195–212.
Topik: America; cosmopolitan; democracy; International Criminal Court; international society
Fulltext: 195.IR17.2.pdf (98.83KB)

Isi artikel

The International Criminal Court can be seen as a cosmopolitan response to the problems of global democracy. This article demonstrates how opponents of the Court use a concern for international order to disguise a policy motivated by a narrow conception of the national interest. US opposition reveals the extent to which it fears being held accountable for the way America uses the great power veto on the UN Security Council. America’s opposition to the Court has also succeeded in bringing to the surface the extent to which American foreign policy is driven by communitarian conceptions of democracy and international society. Despite promising to hold power accountable for egregious human rights violations, the Court is considered a threat to American sovereignty and dismissed as undemocratic. The article argues that this communitarian understanding of democracy promotion will be increasingly problematic as the processes of globalization undermine the capacity of states to guarantee human rights.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali