Fisheries, Wildlife, and Philosophy of Science: An Exercise in Definition  

Oleh:

Cohen, Benjamin R.

Jenis: Article from Journal - ilmiah internasional
Dalam koleksi: Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society vol. 20 no. 6 (Dec. 2000), page 466-479.
Topik: Wildlife science; philosophy of science; ethnography; participant-observer; conservation biology
Fulltext: 466BSTS206.pdf (105.17KB)

Isi artikel

The Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences (FWS) graduate program at Virginia Tech held a student- led, discussion-based, 9-week seminar in the philosophy of science during the fall 1999 semester. This seminar presented the sociologist of science with the opportunity to investigate questions such as,Howdoes a contemporary scientific discipline use the philosophy of science? What do scientists hope to gain from an understanding of demarcation issues? And how do they perceive themselves as a science? Issues of demarcation between science and pseudo-science are prevalent in FWS. The role of public funding is at the forefront of the department’s concerns, as governmental agencies are responsible, to a dominant degree, for funding research that the public assumes will benefit them. Thus, the concerns of the department are of utility, or the perception thereof. An investigation of the sort proposed here is practical yet restrictive. The topics are preselected and noncomprehensive because the seminar organizers in FWS chose select readings pertinent to their discipline. Discussions revolved around such topics as the definition of science, methodology, credibility, specialization within FWS, the value (or lack thereof) of theory in FWS, the manager-scientist distinction, and the use of models. The intent of this article is to provide a brief ethnographic view of the seminar. It will review some of the seminar topics and relate them to the broader issue of scientific selfdefinition and the concept of science as a social mechanism. It is not an evaluative article about FWS but a descriptive article about how a scientific discipline regards itself.

Opini Anda

Klik untuk menuliskan opini Anda tentang koleksi ini!

Kembali